epc-record

Utility relocation of the distribution tap

A change order is not merely a price-and-days transaction. It is a governed resolution of a triggered risk allocation — and what it does not resolve stays visible.

ILLUSTRATIVE · SAMPLE DATA
A synthetic negotiation fixture, not the governed record. No figure here is filed, and none of it is aggregated with the filed instruments.

Risk resolution

The continuity chain, in order. No separate change-order risk framework.

Linked risk allocation
Utility delay §8.4 · Owner
Original position
Owner · 45 d · $0 direct RECORD
Trigger: Required utility service not available by contractual readiness date
Event observed
2026-06-22
Distribution tap relocated by the utility after the readiness date
Initial exposure
15 d · $0 direct · $270k time economics
COUNTERFACTUALRECORDCOUNTERFACTUAL
Time economics = observed days × $18,000.00/day delay economics.
Proposed resolution
Time relief only, 15 days
Executed change order
CO-015 · $0.00 · 10 days · executed 2026-07-09 RECORD
Residual risk
PARTIALLY RESOLVED · 5 days open · $0 direct open
5 days remain open; owner time economics on those days stay COUNTERFACTUAL.
Closes on: an agreed extension or a determination on the remaining 5 days

Change-order risk resolution

What risk the change order actually resolved — not merely a price and a day count.

RiskOriginal positionEvent exposureCO resolutionResidual
Differing site conditions
Unexpected underground duct bank
Owner21–35 d / $900k+18 d / $740k3–17 d open · partially resolved
Utility delay
Utility relocation of the distribution tap
Owner15 d / $0+10 d / time relief only5 d open · partially resolved

A change order does not automatically close a risk. Remaining uncertainty stays on the record until an act closes it.

What the change order changed — object matrix

Scope, money, risk and schedule move together against the same objects. A change order that has been executed but not decomposed shows as a GAP, never as a balanced set of rows.

Unexpected underground duct bank — proposed decomposition COUNTERFACTUAL
ObjectEngineeringProcurementConstructionObject totalDaysRiskProvenance
Feeder B$18k$122k$345k$485k11Differing site conditionsCOUNTERFACTUAL
Feeder C$16k$108k$306k$430k9Differing site conditionsCOUNTERFACTUAL
Road crossing 07$41k$80k$164k$285k8Differing site conditionsCOUNTERFACTUAL
Claimed decomposition, summed$75k$310k$815k$1,200,000.0028The filed total and the summed lines agree.
Money stateAmount
Claimed (proposed decomposition)$1,200,000.00
Executed under CO-014 (governed)$740,000.00
Claimed less executed$460,000.00 COUNTERFACTUAL
Executed money decomposed onto objectsGAP — no object mapping filed for the executed instrument
SOV effect (claimed)Delta
2300 Collection system$915,000.00
2100 Roads and site civil$285,000.00

The claimed decomposition below totals $1,200,000. The governed change order CO-014 executed $740,000 and has not been decomposed across objects — that mapping is a GAP, not a pro-rata split.

A claimed decomposition and an executed change order are two separate figures. The difference is stated only where the change order was executed in settlement of the claim. The change order was executed in settlement of this claim.

Illustrative object graph. The object effect, the SOV effect, the risk effect and the schedule effect are four separate columns because they are four separate facts.